Home | About LCPS | Contact | Careers

Featured Analysis


Sami Atallah, LCPS Executive Director


March 2014
Sustainable Plans for Oil and Gas

 
In the coming years, Lebanon could begin to reap the benefits of the country’s offshore oil and gas reserves. These resources could be worth tens of billions of dollars in a country where annual gross domestic product is a little more than $40 billion.
 
As such, they have the potential to completely reform the country’s economy and society. But the dangers are also clear, almost every society that discovers resources ends up less competitive in other key sectors of the economy – the so-called resource curse. Whether Lebanon can avoid this depends on well-planned sustainable development.
 
One absolutely key decision will be how the oil money will eventually be spent.Article 3 of the 2010 offshore petroleum resources law stipulates that the net proceeds of oil and gas will be deposited in a sovereign wealth fund (SWF). The law, however, stops short of dictating how the fund will be run, instead saying it would be governed by a “specific law” which will be passed later. This article alone, one of 77 in the 2010 law, dominated the debate in parliament when the law was voted on. This is hardly a surprise – Lebanese politicians have a habit of focusing on where the cash will go.
 
This fund is key to Lebanon’s development. How well it is managed will depend on the institutional arrangement that the government puts in place to govern it. It must be said that Lebanon’s record in managing funds is pretty dismal.Take for instance the Fund for the Displaced which has recently been marred with corruption charges, or the Council of the South – which could help developof one of the country’s poorest regionsbut sooften the money seems to evaporate before reaching its target.
 
There is one example of a country avoiding the resource curse – Norway. This was because of the country’s exemplary and powerful SWF – a product of a long and ongoing process of reform. With an eye on sustainable growth, Norwegian governments have given the fund significant independence, but also sought to keep it modern. It has gone through three major reforms and experimentations to become the leading SWF in the world. 
 
To get the best deal for all, Lebanon’s sovereign wealth fund must adhere to four basic principles:
 
1. It must have clearly specified objectives and investment strategies. This provides the mandate of the fund in terms of what it should be investing in such as bonds, stocks, real estate in local or international markets.
 
2. It must have clear fiscal rules to access the funds. A fundamental issue that ought to be addressed is the conditions under which the government can use the earnings of the fund.  Without having clear specified criteria, politicians will be tempted to resort to the fund to finance their personal or electoral needs.
 
3. It needs a proper governance structure which clearly identifies the role of the government, the governing bodies and the managers of the SWF. It must state the role of the managers in making investment decisions.
 
4.The fund must be transparent and accountable to the public.  To do so, it must show how it conducts its investment strategy (i.e. what are its investment categories), how it uses benchmarks and credit ratings. It must also regularly post the size of the fund, its rate of return, location of investment, and its currency composition. It must regularly publish reports as well as conduct and publish regular independent audits.
 
These conditions are necessary but not sufficient. For the fund to be effectively managed, it must be properly integrated into the public finance, otherwise even a well-managed fund will be undermined by weak budgetary system. Politicians will use it to further mismanage the budget and avoid necessary reforms, and the SWF could even end up as a second or a parallel budget that the government could then implicitly borrow against. This would lead the country straight to the resource curse.
 
Lebanon’s record in managing its public finance is poor. Not only there has been no budget since 2005, but the weak budgetary institutions which include multiple budgets, weak auditing and lack of transparency will undermine the prospects of properly managing the fund. Without these conditions in place, Lebanese citizens will not reap the benefits of the resource.
 
Many Lebanese politicians are pretending that the country’s oil and gas will solve the country’s problems but that is far from certain. In fact, if badly run it could make corruption worse. If we want to avoid the resource curse, we need to start reforming the fiscal institutions now to ensure that SWF will serve sustainable development.

This article was published in Executive Magazine under the title: Plan an Oil and Gas Sovereign Wealth Fund.






Copyright © 2017 by the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies, Inc. All rights reserved. Design and developed by Polypod.